<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Static Analysis and Generated Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/</link>
	<description>C# • Entity Framework • Functional Programming • MVC • Web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/#comment-17990</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/?p=38396#comment-17990</guid>
		<description>I do not see a response to Craig's question.  I am also interested in the same point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not see a response to Craig&#8217;s question.  I am also interested in the same point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Stuntz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/#comment-9591</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Stuntz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/?p=38396#comment-9591</guid>
		<description>Patrick,

That sounds great! It would be especially nice if I could do this on both a per-project and a per-test basis. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like I can only do it per-test with the shipping version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,</p>
<p>That sounds great! It would be especially nice if I could do this on both a per-project and a per-test basis. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but it seems like I can only do it per-test with the shipping version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Smacchia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Smacchia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/?p=38396#comment-9586</guid>
		<description>We (the NDepend team) have some plans to provide deeper exclusion mechanism with NDepend and CQL.
Basically, we thought about having a customizable range of dedicated CQL statement like...
EXCLUDE METHODS WHERE FileNameLike ".designer.cs"
EXCLUDE METHODS WHERE IsGeneratedByCompiler
EXCLUDE TYPES WHERE HasAttribute "GeneratedAttribute"
etc...
This will let user finely do the distinction between human and generated code and will put an end to false positive dilemma on generated code. 
This feature should be released in first half of 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We (the NDepend team) have some plans to provide deeper exclusion mechanism with NDepend and CQL.<br />
Basically, we thought about having a customizable range of dedicated CQL statement like&#8230;<br />
EXCLUDE METHODS WHERE FileNameLike ".designer.cs"<br />
EXCLUDE METHODS WHERE IsGeneratedByCompiler<br />
EXCLUDE TYPES WHERE HasAttribute "GeneratedAttribute"<br />
etc&#8230;<br />
This will let user finely do the distinction between human and generated code and will put an end to false positive dilemma on generated code.<br />
This feature should be released in first half of 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

