<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Static Analysis and Generated Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/</link>
	<description>C# • Delphi • Entity Framework • Functional Programming • InterBase • MVC • .NET • Web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Stuntz&#8217;s Weblog : NDepend Review and Tips</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/#comment-9762</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Stuntz&#8217;s Weblog : NDepend Review and Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/?p=38396#comment-9762</guid>
		<description>[...] However, you don&#8217;t get the same kind of customizability at a global level. You can include and exclude assemblies from analysis globally, but that&#8217;s about it. So while you can include and exclude code based on almost any imaginable criterion at the level of an individual test, I have not found any way to do an exclusion like the one I demonstrate above globally. (Note, however, that in a comment on this blog a week ago, a member of the NDepend team suggested that features along this line may be coming next year.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, you don&#8217;t get the same kind of customizability at a global level. You can include and exclude assemblies from analysis globally, but that&#8217;s about it. So while you can include and exclude code based on almost any imaginable criterion at the level of an individual test, I have not found any way to do an exclusion like the one I demonstrate above globally. (Note, however, that in a comment on this blog a week ago, a member of the NDepend team suggested that features along this line may be coming next year.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Stuntz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/#comment-9591</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Stuntz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/?p=38396#comment-9591</guid>
		<description>Patrick,

That sounds great! It would be especially nice if I could do this on both a per-project and a per-test basis. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like I can only do it per-test with the shipping version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,</p>
<p>That sounds great! It would be especially nice if I could do this on both a per-project and a per-test basis. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but it seems like I can only do it per-test with the shipping version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Smacchia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2009/09/16/38396/#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Smacchia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/?p=38396#comment-9586</guid>
		<description>We (the NDepend team) have some plans to provide deeper exclusion mechanism with NDepend and CQL.
Basically, we thought about having a customizable range of dedicated CQL statement like...
EXCLUDE METHODS WHERE FileNameLike ".designer.cs"
EXCLUDE METHODS WHERE IsGeneratedByCompiler
EXCLUDE TYPES WHERE HasAttribute "GeneratedAttribute"
etc...
This will let user finely do the distinction between human and generated code and will put an end to false positive dilemma on generated code. 
This feature should be released in first half of 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We (the NDepend team) have some plans to provide deeper exclusion mechanism with NDepend and CQL.<br />
Basically, we thought about having a customizable range of dedicated CQL statement like&#8230;<br />
EXCLUDE METHODS WHERE FileNameLike ".designer.cs"<br />
EXCLUDE METHODS WHERE IsGeneratedByCompiler<br />
EXCLUDE TYPES WHERE HasAttribute "GeneratedAttribute"<br />
etc&#8230;<br />
This will let user finely do the distinction between human and generated code and will put an end to false positive dilemma on generated code.<br />
This feature should be released in first half of 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
