Comments on: In LINQ, Beware of Skip(0)

By: Sergey

Sergey — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:28:57 +0000

Thanks, nice explanation !

By: Craig Stuntz’s Weblog : Skip(0) in LINQ and Testing

Craig Stuntz’s Weblog : Skip(0) in LINQ and Testing — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:53:46 +0000

[...] couple of weeks ago, I wrote In LINQ, Beware of Skip(0). In that post, I observed that calling Skip(0) on a query result in LINQ, which has no effect on [...]

By: Craig Stuntz

Craig Stuntz — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:53:55 +0000

Thanks, Damien; that’s actually a reasonable explanation.

By: Damien Guard

Damien Guard — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:50:27 +0000

Skip(0) will also not be a no-op in LINQ to SQL in 4.0 - special casing it caused all sorts of subtle odd behavior not least of all people thinking queries were valid because they worked on the first page only to find they broke when they hit the second.

[)amien

By: Craig Stuntz

Craig Stuntz — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:38:14 +0000

Thanks for the quick fix! I’ll update the post.

By: Troy Goode

Troy Goode — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:46:33 +0000

Excellent catch, Craig. I have posted an updated version to CodePlex:

http://pagedlist.codeplex.com/