<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Off-Topic Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2006/03/02/23604/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2006/03/02/23604/</link>
	<description>News of interest to Delphi, .NET, and InterBase programmers</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Stuntz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2006/03/02/23604/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Stuntz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 07:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2006/03/02/23531/#comment-467</guid>
		<description>I saw the EB reply, and Nature's reply to the reply, and neither of them really struck me as saying anything profound; ass-covering doesn't usually make for interesting reading. I thought the &#34;Correcting the Record&#34; piece was interesting because it discussed the sites in terms of how they handle failure, which isn't generally how we discuss journalism. But it's how we *should* think as programmers, I believe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the EB reply, and Nature&#8217;s reply to the reply, and neither of them really struck me as saying anything profound; ass-covering doesn&#8217;t usually make for interesting reading. I thought the &quot;Correcting the Record&quot; piece was interesting because it discussed the sites in terms of how they handle failure, which isn&#8217;t generally how we discuss journalism. But it&#8217;s how we *should* think as programmers, I believe.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
