<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Can&#8217;t Fix Your Buggy Browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20618/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20618/</link>
	<description>News of interest to Delphi, .NET, and InterBase programmers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Stuntz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20618/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Stuntz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20614/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Note also that people who read this site are not &#34;my customers.&#34; My customers are not developers and don't read this site. People who read this site are developers who find it worth their time to read technical articles I publish for free and without advertising in my spare time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Roughly 0.005% or so of the people who want to read the information posted here for free also complain about how it's presented, FWIW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note also that people who read this site are not &quot;my customers.&quot; My customers are not developers and don&#8217;t read this site. People who read this site are developers who find it worth their time to read technical articles I publish for free and without advertising in my spare time.</p>
<p>Roughly 0.005% or so of the people who want to read the information posted here for free also complain about how it&#8217;s presented, FWIW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doogal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20618/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Doogal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20614/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Yes, I did read what you wrote. As a software developer I have to deal with buggy software all the time. Generally I have to workaround the problems rather than ask my customers to change their database/OS/browser...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW I use FireFox, mostly for the tabbed browsing and useful plugins available, not for it's superior CSS support. In fact, most sites look better in IE to my untrained eyes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I did read what you wrote. As a software developer I have to deal with buggy software all the time. Generally I have to workaround the problems rather than ask my customers to change their database/OS/browser&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW I use FireFox, mostly for the tabbed browsing and useful plugins available, not for it&#8217;s superior CSS support. In fact, most sites look better in IE to my untrained eyes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Stuntz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20618/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Stuntz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20614/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>Doogal, did you even bother to read what I wrote? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do consider folks who have to live with IE's buggy CSS handling; that's why anything I write currently doesn't use the HTML/CSS which triggers the bugs recently introduced into IE, even though the HTML I have to use to work around the problem is in a sense improper. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed, if I was unconcerned about IE users I wouldn't have bothered to write this post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So can the sarcasm, please. If you want to live with a browser which can't handle CSS properly, that's up to you. Just don't blame me for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doogal, did you even bother to read what I wrote? </p>
<p>I do consider folks who have to live with IE&#8217;s buggy CSS handling; that&#8217;s why anything I write currently doesn&#8217;t use the HTML/CSS which triggers the bugs recently introduced into IE, even though the HTML I have to use to work around the problem is in a sense improper. </p>
<p>Indeed, if I was unconcerned about IE users I wouldn&#8217;t have bothered to write this post.</p>
<p>So can the sarcasm, please. If you want to live with a browser which can&#8217;t handle CSS properly, that&#8217;s up to you. Just don&#8217;t blame me for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doogal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20618/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Doogal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20614/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Good attitude. After all, why worry about the IE users, they only constitute 85% of the browsing public...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good attitude. After all, why worry about the IE users, they only constitute 85% of the browsing public&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Stuntz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20618/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Stuntz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 20:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20614/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>David, although I think IE6's CSS support is terrible I'm not going to judge IE 7 until it's released. I think it's kind of funny to see open-source advocates faulting the IE 7 *beta* for breaking third-party plugins, given the fact that I had to update my Firefox extensions repeatedly as it moved from 0.7 to 1.0. It might be nice if existing IE6 toolbars just work in IE 7, but even if they don't it's hardly a cause for scandal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And of course a beta version of IE is likely to break apps which host MSHTML. Folks who install beta software on their machine need to expect this. It's not as though Microsoft has been reserved about stating that IE is part of the OS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm just a little tired of being blamed for IE6's buggy layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, although I think IE6&#8217;s CSS support is terrible I&#8217;m not going to judge IE 7 until it&#8217;s released. I think it&#8217;s kind of funny to see open-source advocates faulting the IE 7 *beta* for breaking third-party plugins, given the fact that I had to update my Firefox extensions repeatedly as it moved from 0.7 to 1.0. It might be nice if existing IE6 toolbars just work in IE 7, but even if they don&#8217;t it&#8217;s hardly a cause for scandal. </p>
<p>And of course a beta version of IE is likely to break apps which host MSHTML. Folks who install beta software on their machine need to expect this. It&#8217;s not as though Microsoft has been reserved about stating that IE is part of the OS.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just a little tired of being blamed for IE6&#8217;s buggy layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20618/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 19:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20614/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Internet Exploreer 7 gives standards the finger: &#60;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.siliconvalleysleuth.com/2005/08/internet_explor.html&#62;"&gt;http://www.siliconvalleysleuth.com/2005/08/internet_explor.html&#62;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet Exploreer 7 gives standards the finger: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.siliconvalleysleuth.com/2005/08/internet_explor.html&gt;"></a><a href="http://www.siliconvalleysleuth.com/2005/08/internet_explor.html&#038;gt" rel="nofollow">http://www.siliconvalleysleuth.com/2005/08/internet_explor.html&#038;gt</a>;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester Caine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20618/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester Caine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 11:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/08/02/20614/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Right on .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
