<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online "Journalism" Approaching New Low</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/05/13/4304/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/05/13/4304/</link>
	<description>News of interest to Delphi, .NET, and InterBase programmers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dean Hill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/05/13/4304/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 13:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/05/13/4282/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>What makes the whole situation disgusting is firstly the way personal information and insults can be so readily published as &#34;news&#34; and then how the publishing company who approved the article and indicated that they found nothing wrong with the article, all of a sudden says &#34;To Our Valued Readers: (May 13, 2005) - Our syndication arrangement with&lt;br&gt;LinuxGram has recently ended after ethical questions raised by our readers in&lt;br&gt;one of the articles published in last week's issue. I agree with their view on&lt;br&gt;this matter and we pulled the article shortly after it was published.&lt;br&gt;I apologize to our readers, to the open source community, our LinuxWorld&lt;br&gt;editors, and Ms. Pamela Jones for publishing the article.&lt;br&gt;Fuat Kircaali Publisher, SYS-CON Media&#34;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes the whole situation disgusting is firstly the way personal information and insults can be so readily published as &quot;news&quot; and then how the publishing company who approved the article and indicated that they found nothing wrong with the article, all of a sudden says &quot;To Our Valued Readers: (May 13, 2005) - Our syndication arrangement with<br />
<br />LinuxGram has recently ended after ethical questions raised by our readers in<br />
<br />one of the articles published in last week&#8217;s issue. I agree with their view on<br />
<br />this matter and we pulled the article shortly after it was published.<br />
<br />I apologize to our readers, to the open source community, our LinuxWorld<br />
<br />editors, and Ms. Pamela Jones for publishing the article.<br />
<br />Fuat Kircaali Publisher, SYS-CON Media&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/05/13/4304/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 09:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/05/13/4282/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>I think the standard of journalism in general is pretty low these days. Ever watched Fox News?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the standard of journalism in general is pretty low these days. Ever watched Fox News?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim McKeeth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/05/13/4304/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim McKeeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 12:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2005/05/13/4282/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Amen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And to think the so called professional Journalists are critical of Blog fact checking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.</p>
<p>And to think the so called professional Journalists are critical of Blog fact checking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
